By Eric F. Epler | eepler@pennlive.com
on January 21, 2015 6:45 PM, updated January 21, 2015 7:49 PM
A new proposal to expand the PIAA football playoff format from four to six classifications is gaining steam around the Commonwealth.
Constructed by Bob Tonkin, a member of the football steering committee from District 9, the 16-page proposal offers a comprehensive breakdown on how six classifications would promote a more level playing field by narrowing the gap in enrollment figures inside each class.
Tonkin's proposal also aims to shorten the season by one week, lessening the chance of inclement weather hindering championship weekend. Only California and Texas (Dec. 20) crowned its 2014 champions later than Pennsylvania (Dec. 13).
Under the current system, roughly 145 football programs in the state compete in each classification. Expanding to six classes would bring that total to approximately 97 per class.
"Having worked and been all over the state, I've heard all the reasons from coaches or administrators on why we shouldn't change," said Tonkin, who submitted the proposal to the PIAA last month.
"I sat down and listed all those reasons and asked are they really valid reasons? So many times we say what's in the best interest of our student-athletes. Are we really doing that?"
If approved by the PIAA Board of Directors - a move several stages away - expansion would be in place for the 2016 season. Tonkin is expected to further discuss the proposal with directors of the Pennsylvania Scholastic Football Coaches Association at Penn State University Friday and Saturday.
Should the PIAA expand to 6 classifications in football?
The proposal would need to pass through the strategic planning committee and PIAA Board of Control before reaching the Board of Directors.
In 2009, a similar proposal reached the final stage and needed a two-thirds majority, or 21 affirmative votes, to complete the expansion to six classifications. It was eventually voted down 15-13.
WPIAL representatives were among those who strongly opposed expansion, a decision directly linked to its one-day championship round at Heinz Field. The Pittsburgh Steelers' home venue has hosted every WPIAL championship game since 2001.
"We're very proud and very protective of what we've done with the football championships, and [expanding] would take the shine from our apple," WPIAL executive director Tim O'Malley said in 2009.
WHAT THEY'RE SAYING
The subject of expanding PIAA football to six classifications will be dissected over the next few months. PennLive offered a quick email poll to around 75 District 3 football coaches on Tuesday.
Nearly 80-percent of coaches who responded were in favor of expanding, although a handful believed the current proposal doesn't address the ongoing debate of separating public and private schools.
"I don't think we need 6 classifications. Just one, non-public, if your district is not defined by geographic boundaries then you fall into this classification. It takes into account all parochial, cyber, or magnet schools." - Lancaster-Lebanon League coach
"I would rather rather see it stay with 4 classes and add two classes for parochial or private schools." - L-L coach
"I am in favor of change, but 6 classifications will not fix the public vs. private issue. I would have no problem keeping 4 classes of public then 2 (big and small school) of private." - L-L coach
"Being from one of the smallest schools in the district I would support a six classification system." - Tri-Valley League coach
"I would be in favor of discussing the change, but there are plenty of questions to be answered." - Mid-Penn coach
on January 21, 2015 6:45 PM, updated January 21, 2015 7:49 PM
A new proposal to expand the PIAA football playoff format from four to six classifications is gaining steam around the Commonwealth.
Constructed by Bob Tonkin, a member of the football steering committee from District 9, the 16-page proposal offers a comprehensive breakdown on how six classifications would promote a more level playing field by narrowing the gap in enrollment figures inside each class.
Tonkin's proposal also aims to shorten the season by one week, lessening the chance of inclement weather hindering championship weekend. Only California and Texas (Dec. 20) crowned its 2014 champions later than Pennsylvania (Dec. 13).
Under the current system, roughly 145 football programs in the state compete in each classification. Expanding to six classes would bring that total to approximately 97 per class.
"Having worked and been all over the state, I've heard all the reasons from coaches or administrators on why we shouldn't change," said Tonkin, who submitted the proposal to the PIAA last month.
"I sat down and listed all those reasons and asked are they really valid reasons? So many times we say what's in the best interest of our student-athletes. Are we really doing that?"
If approved by the PIAA Board of Directors - a move several stages away - expansion would be in place for the 2016 season. Tonkin is expected to further discuss the proposal with directors of the Pennsylvania Scholastic Football Coaches Association at Penn State University Friday and Saturday.
Should the PIAA expand to 6 classifications in football?
The proposal would need to pass through the strategic planning committee and PIAA Board of Control before reaching the Board of Directors.
In 2009, a similar proposal reached the final stage and needed a two-thirds majority, or 21 affirmative votes, to complete the expansion to six classifications. It was eventually voted down 15-13.
WPIAL representatives were among those who strongly opposed expansion, a decision directly linked to its one-day championship round at Heinz Field. The Pittsburgh Steelers' home venue has hosted every WPIAL championship game since 2001.
"We're very proud and very protective of what we've done with the football championships, and [expanding] would take the shine from our apple," WPIAL executive director Tim O'Malley said in 2009.
WHAT THEY'RE SAYING
The subject of expanding PIAA football to six classifications will be dissected over the next few months. PennLive offered a quick email poll to around 75 District 3 football coaches on Tuesday.
Nearly 80-percent of coaches who responded were in favor of expanding, although a handful believed the current proposal doesn't address the ongoing debate of separating public and private schools.
"I don't think we need 6 classifications. Just one, non-public, if your district is not defined by geographic boundaries then you fall into this classification. It takes into account all parochial, cyber, or magnet schools." - Lancaster-Lebanon League coach
"I would rather rather see it stay with 4 classes and add two classes for parochial or private schools." - L-L coach
"I am in favor of change, but 6 classifications will not fix the public vs. private issue. I would have no problem keeping 4 classes of public then 2 (big and small school) of private." - L-L coach
"Being from one of the smallest schools in the district I would support a six classification system." - Tri-Valley League coach
"I would be in favor of discussing the change, but there are plenty of questions to be answered." - Mid-Penn coach