my guess is BM has never had a player living in a different state than PA
Prep has had students from NJ for 80 years. So it’s far from something new and many kids live closer to the school than kids from in the city. The school was initiated in 1851. It has been in the PCL for extended period of time. Their physical resources are far more limited than the vast majority of schools, especially the “boundary” schools. Every kid pays tuition, 64% get assistance based on need, 25 students get scholarships ranging from 1500 to 15k based on merit, specifically, their score on entrance test, but most pay on average $15k, some pay the full tuition. Legacy is a big deal with 32% being from prior families attending. As far as PCL, most here have no idea, based on comments, how it works and has worked over time. The biggest issue is the quality of a PCL education, particularly a Prep education, supersedes any school in the city with the exception of Masterman and maybe Central. Public education in the city of Philadelphia is woeful with 56% graduation rate. It’s the driving force to pushing kids to PCL, always has been. As far as PCL in PIAA, the PCL was courted heavily by PIAA and PCL made it clear that their policies would not change and they wanted to preserve the integrity of their league (PCL). This was a result mostly of the 2003 season and North Penn’s dominance and Prep’s schedule with losses of playing a couple games out of state and the contention by North Penn and PIAA that PA football was better and the way to find out was to include PCL in the league. Another reminder that Prep has played games out of state for over 30 years.
Open boundary is a clear advantage and open enrollment within the public schools would be advantageous for all, because competition is healthy, but the union would never allow that. Additionally, Prep has become a vacuum because of the precedent they set. Sadly, less kids are playing football and therefore, opportunities are perceived differently now, meaning the ability to play at a high level is desirous. And yes, the goal all along has been to be battle tested by playoff time. Look at the comparison to some college schedules and the proverbial strength of schedule. They are not a traveling all star team. They fill the schedule over the years with challenging games and only one game over the last 12 years has been a distance game (TX, FL, GA, CA), most games are NJ, MD and previously OH. They are well coached and the expectations are high and academics are not compromised. There have been kids that have left because it is demanding. Off season training is 5:30am and alternative training includes yoga, meditation and visualization exercises (seeing yourself in the moment). Yes, the majority of schools would be prohibited from pushing the workout envelope the way prep does so they do work harder than most. I’ve heard it from other parents across a wide spectrum. It’s a family commitment.
Yes, PCL has been competitive since inclusion in PIAA. Simple math says demographic density leads to greater mutual choices. It won’t last forever and Prep is doing nothing different than they have for many decades. Frankly, football seems to have shifted with it being better in the east. Do swift, Zaccheus, Runyan make their ascent going elsewhere?? Maybe? Probably? Definitely? … it doesn’t matter because they did it at the Prep and that’s a draw for the current population. In many ways, prep was in the right place at the right time. Ironically, their rowing program and theater program are better than football but football has the eye effect. The PCL has already modified their divisions for next year. While demand for PCL is still relative, the charter choices are more extensive and the family size has shrunk. Many families of the past had 4+ kids, obviously, that’s no longer the case so PCL is challenged for admissions. This won’t last forever. Damn my fingers hurt. If you read down to here then God Bless - Go Prep!