ADVERTISEMENT

6A Eastern Final

DTW is a run-first team. They ran for approximately 10 yards vs CB West. Let's assume that SJP is better up front than CBW, and DTW has to drop back and throw the ball against the SJP secondary AND protect their QB from the cover zero blitzes they'll see. It probably won't end well.
 
DTW is a run-first team. They ran for approximately 10 yards vs CB West. Let's assume that SJP is better up front than CBW, and DTW has to drop back and throw the ball against the SJP secondary AND protect their QB from the cover zero blitzes they'll see. It probably won't end well.
Seven touchdowns?
 
DWest has better practice facilities, an awesome stadium, and even has heat (and AC) in the school. That should make up for the slight advantage of pulling from solely inside school district boundaries versus building a roster from anywhere in SE PA.

It should be an all-time classic, down-to-the-wire game.
 
DWest has better practice facilities, an awesome stadium, and even has heat (and AC) in the school. That should make up for the slight advantage of pulling from solely inside school district boundaries versus building a roster from anywhere in SE PA.

It should be an all-time classic, down-to-the-wire game.
You’ve been beating the same drum for a while now so I’ll dive in. Open enrollment is clearly a major advantage. But why would kids come from a 45 minutes to hour radius and pay tuition and be held to some pretty intense academic standards? Seriously? A number of them are that good that they will be recognized and play anywhere right? They most certainly will get noticed, so why bother with all the other items? Dig deeper - what is it? Seriously? Is it the ability to schedule competitive out of league games? Is it the travel to one big away game? Has the opportunity for visibility and NIL at the next level driven it? Are less or more kids playing the game? What would do it? Because I can tell you for certain that it’s much easier to play in most other if not all other places, so the question is why?
 
Sounds like good questions to ask Prep kids and their families. I’m sure their reasons are multifaceted.

Regardless, the reasons wouldn’t begin to justify allowing non boundary teams to play in the same playoff bracket as boundary teams. It’s ridiculous and the non boundary squads are delusional if they don’t see it.
 
Sounds like good questions to ask Prep kids and their families. I’m sure their reasons are multifaceted.

Regardless, the reasons wouldn’t begin to justify allowing non boundary teams to play in the same playoff bracket as boundary teams. It’s ridiculous and the non boundary squads are delusional if they don’t see it.
As Roxy said, we certainly see the advantages of not having boundaries, but we also don't think that's close to the whole story.

Why is it quite different in Ohio where boundary and non-boundary schools have been playing each other in playoffs and (much more than in PA) regular season games for a long time?

I'll throw one more idea into the mix. Playing at SJP requires a greater sacrifice (from parents as well as players) than playing at just about any public school. Many have pointed out that roughly a third of the players come from Jersey--mostly from towns in Jersey at least 10 miles from the school, sometimes 30 or more miles from the school. (Some of the PA players also travel about as far each day.) Almost no Prep players come from within 5 miles of the school. What that means is that players like Sacco, Smith, and Foulke--like McCord and the Johnsons before them--each day spend about two hours travelling to and from school--or to and from practice, on days when classes aren't held. And if they don't do a fair bit of homework each school night, they won't last at the school. (I'm not saying players at other schools don't have homework to do or don't sometimes have a commute--but if they are at a boundary school it's hard to see how their commute can be more than 15 minutes and, on average, they probably have less homework than Prep players do. I also recognize that players at public schools, especially in poor areas, sometimes have significant challenges at home and in their neighborhoods.)

I've seen tapes of Roken talking to the players and reminding them about the sacrifices they've made. A sacrifice grows out of a commitment; it also strengthens that commitment. About a week ago Rover pointed out that Catholic / non-boundary schools have been doing very well in a wide range of sports within the PIAA, not just football and basketball. Maybe part of the reason is that the athletes and their families make sacrifices (of time as well as of money) so they can attend the schools they attend and participate on the schools' athletic teams. This doesn't make them better people but it does mean they are more invested in the schools and the teams. Being intentional can be very helpful.
 
What is different about Ohio again?

Division I has had public schools win state titles in - 2019, 2017, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2000, 1998, 1997, 1996, 1990, 1987, 1986, 1983, 1981, 1978, 1974, and 1972. So 17 of the 51 championships, and only six of the last 24. There are MORE private schools and pass the titles around, but St. Ed's, Archbishop Moeller, Bishop Elder, St. Xavier, St. Ignatius all dominate.

In smaller schols, you have Toledo Central Catholic with five titles, St. Vincent St. Mary's with seven, Cleveland Benedictine with seven, Cardinal Mooney with eight, Bishop Hoban with five (all since 2015 when they made a real commitment to football), Cincinnati LaSalle has four (all since 2014), Youngstown Ursuline has four.

Division II, there have been public school champs in 2023, 2021, 2013, 2011, 2010 - so only five in the last 14 years. Division III has had public school champs from 2017-2022, but didn't have a public school champ for ten years before that (Bishop Hoban moving up certainly helped there). There are not a lot of small private schools in Ohio (in the same way there aren't small private schools in Central PA) because almost all of the small schools are super rural and their cutoffs for Divisions (they have eight) are way smaller than ours.

There are more non-boundary powerhouses, so rather than one school winning eight of eleven, you have four different schools splitting them up (though Ed's has six since 2014) but non-boundary schools absolutely dominate Ohio high school football, and have since forever.

This year, St. Ed's and Moeller are heavy favorites in semis in D1. Archbishop Hoban is a big favorite in D2, three of the four teams in D3 are catholic schools (Ursuline, Toledo CC, and Bishop Watterson), D4 has Glenville, which is like Cleveland's Imhotep, then all of the tiny, tiny town public schools in the lower divisions.
 
What is different about Ohio again?

Division I has had public schools win state titles in - 2019, 2017, 2009, 2006, 2004, 2000, 1998, 1997, 1996, 1990, 1987, 1986, 1983, 1981, 1978, 1974, and 1972. So 17 of the 51 championships, and only six of the last 24. There are MORE private schools and pass the titles around, but St. Ed's, Archbishop Moeller, Bishop Elder, St. Xavier, St. Ignatius all dominate.

In smaller schols, you have Toledo Central Catholic with five titles, St. Vincent St. Mary's with seven, Cleveland Benedictine with seven, Cardinal Mooney with eight, Bishop Hoban with five (all since 2015 when they made a real commitment to football), Cincinnati LaSalle has four (all since 2014), Youngstown Ursuline has four.

Division II, there have been public school champs in 2023, 2021, 2013, 2011, 2010 - so only five in the last 14 years. Division III has had public school champs from 2017-2022, but didn't have a public school champ for ten years before that (Bishop Hoban moving up certainly helped there). There are not a lot of small private schools in Ohio (in the same way there aren't small private schools in Central PA) because almost all of the small schools are super rural and their cutoffs for Divisions (they have eight) are way smaller than ours.

There are more non-boundary powerhouses, so rather than one school winning eight of eleven, you have four different schools splitting them up (though Ed's has six since 2014) but non-boundary schools absolutely dominate Ohio high school football, and have since forever.

This year, St. Ed's and Moeller are heavy favorites in semis in D1. Archbishop Hoban is a big favorite in D2, three of the four teams in D3 are catholic schools (Ursuline, Toledo CC, and Bishop Watterson), D4 has Glenville, which is like Cleveland's Imhotep, then all of the tiny, tiny town public schools in the lower divisions.
I don't pay as close attention as you do to Ohio high school football, but it seems that even in the days when St. Ignatius and Moeller were so good, they didn't beat the public schools by anything like the margins SJP has been beating PA public schools in most recent years. St. Ed's may be a heavy favorite this week, but they lost two or three games earlier this year to public schools--and they were up 35-7 at the half against SJP (though the final score, 35-21, was probably a better indicator of the difference between the two on that day.) Last year, as I recall, St. Ed's beat a public school team in the final by a single score--nothing like the margins SJP had in 2018, 2019, 2020, 2022, and 2023.

My basic point is that while several Catholic (non-boundary) schools have done very well in PIAA football playoffs, SJP stands out from them all. I think we can all agree to that. Part of the reason is that their location allows them to draw students (including football playing students) from all parts of the Philly area. But, as I've said, Roman is even more central, and LaSalle, Malvern, Haverford, etc. have their own advantages. And it's not as if there haven't been good public school programs during SJP's run. I will be very surprised if SJP's dominance in the PCL since 2013--2015 being the only year they didn't represent District 12 in the playoffs--continues to anything like the same degree in the next several years. We saw LaSalle close the gap substantially this year and there's no reason to think it won't be a hard-fought rivalry for the foreseeable future. No sign, either, that Roman, Malvern, Bonner, etc. won't be at least equally ambitious.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT