And yet ... there are probably at least four teams in North Jersey, at least four in the DC area, and at least a couple in Ohio who would be roughly comparable to SJP--nowhere near four TD underdogs.I’d be surprised if anyone in 6A can stay within 4-5 TDs of SJP. If they were to keep their starters in, their margin of victory would be much, much higher. They were beating both LaSalle and Arch Wood by about 40 at the half.
The '15 Prep team was a mystery. They had Swift, Walls, Dumond, etc. but they were very inconsistent all year--looking great against SJR and St. Ignatius and poor against Bosco and Malvern. The starting QB got hurt, but there seemed to be some other problem too.Tulla, I do agree it is partially an indictment on the competition. However, I’m not sure 06, 13 or 15 SJP could beat the group SJP had this year and last year. This is an extraordinary amount of talent.
You're absolutely right. Lots of reasons for the very disproportionate number of private--almost all Catholic--schools among the top programs.Tulla-not to beat a dead horse and without being lumped into the "haters" group, the common thread for those North Jersey, DC, and Ohio schools is that they are all private schools. Other than Lasalle, PCC & Cathedral Prep, there is no school in Pennsylvania that can attract the kind of talent to compete with Prep,
Tulla, how much better are Hawks this year compared to last year. Not the best of questions I know. Any estimates/guestimates? Had something of a handle on them ly until Central Dauphin.You're absolutely right. Lots of reasons for the very disproportionate number of private--almost all Catholic--schools among the top programs.
Short answer: it's impossible to know. We'd have a good idea if they had been able to play the games in Texas and against St. John's and Bosco. Last year there were five games where they were behind and, as we all know, you learn a lot about a team when they're behind, especially late in games. This year, they've been way ahead in all four games they've played, so we really don't know how they'd do if they were to fall behind as they did last year against Northeast, PCC, etc. Yes, many are the same players, but they also lost quite a bit to graduation.Tulla, how much better are Hawks this year compared to last year. Not the best of questions I know. Any estimates/guestimates? Had something of a handle on them ly until Central Dauphin.
I don't think so. But I expect the Indians to give it their all and be real tough. They got a couple of big lineman that appear to be able to hang with anyone.Does Souderton have a chance?
There's only 1 reason, please stop it and insulting everyone and let it lie.You're absolutely right. Lots of reasons for the very disproportionate number of private--almost all Catholic--schools among the top programs.
And yet ... there are probably at least four teams in North Jersey, at least four in the DC area, and at least a couple in Ohio who would be roughly comparable to SJP--nowhere near four TD underdogs.
I haven't seen them and with a limited sample size of decent but not outstanding teams on their schedule, it's hard to get a fix. I was keying off last year's team/results....transposing that to this year (returning players), factoring in (guessing) their degree of maturity to arrive at a number (power point) to reflect their strength. Thanks tulla.Short answer: it's impossible to know. We'd have a good idea if they had been able to play the games in Texas and against St. John's and Bosco. Last year there were five games where they were behind and, as we all know, you learn a lot about a team when they're behind, especially late in games. This year, they've been way ahead in all four games they've played, so we really don't know how they'd do if they were to fall behind as they did last year against Northeast, PCC, etc. Yes, many are the same players, but they also lost quite a bit to graduation.
People focus on the three high profile seniors: McCord, Trotter, and Harrison. But Hagans and Cooper are also big talents and big-game players, as they showed last year. I don't expect there will be a "fivesome" like them anytime soon at the Prep or anywhere else in the state.
You must be focused on one reason alone--which I assume is the fact that private schools don't have boundaries. Of course that is an advantage, but there are lots of places in the country (including the cities of Philadelphia and New York) where public schools don't have narrow boundaries either. I've never denied not having boundaries is a big advantage, but there are other reasons. Many public schools, for instance, face particular restrictions on who can be coaches. And I would argue that the overall steady decline in the number of boys playing football has meant that boys who are especially keen on football are looking more at schools that offer the best chances of good coaching, good competition, exposure etc. Simply put, if you're good at football and really want to play, you probably don't want to go to a school where the coaches are so-so, there are only a couple of other kids near your level, and there seems little likelihood you'll ever play on a good team. (My impression is that among the public schools, there are more blow-outs than there used to be.)There's only 1 reason, please stop it and insulting everyone and let it lie.
I'm going to indulge myself with a few further thoughts.You must be focused on one reason alone--which I assume is the fact that private schools don't have boundaries. Of course that is an advantage, but there are lots of places in the country (including the cities of Philadelphia and New York) where public schools don't have narrow boundaries either. I've never denied not having boundaries is a big advantage, but there are other reasons. Many public schools, for instance, face particular restrictions on who can be coaches. And I would argue that the overall steady decline in the number of boys playing football has meant that boys who are especially keen on football are looking more at schools that offer the best chances of good coaching, good competition, exposure etc. Simply put, if you're good at football and really want to play, you probably don't want to go to a school where the coaches are so-so, there are only a couple of other kids near your level, and there seems little likelihood you'll ever play on a good team. (My impression is that among the public schools, there are more blow-outs than there used to be.)
It's also true that the demographic profile of kids who play football at all levels has changed. Look at a picture of the Eagles championship team of 1960 or the Notre Dame or Penn State teams of the mid-60's--not to mention the Alabama and LSU teams of the same era--and compare those photos to photos of those teams today. When I started at the Prep in the late 60s every student in the school was from a Catholic family and 98% of us were white. Things are, of course, very different today--not mainly for any reason having to do with sports. But the change has meant that students who might not felt at home there decades ago now feel quite at home. It's also the case that some African-American families, while they are not Catholic, are quite attracted to schools that are Christian. Many families, regardless of race, also are concerned that a boy who's very focused on sports may not pay enough attention to academics. They are therefore drawn to a school where--it is at least their perception--their sons will be kept on the academic straight and narrow. while also pursuing their athletic interests and goals.
I can already hear objections to what I've written, e.g. "What about all the blowouts the Prep has had?" (The answer is that that is one reason the Prep plays the non-league schedule it does.) I could add some nuance, But my main point is that whether it's Ohio, New Jersey, or Pennsylvania there are several factors at work that help explain why things are as they are.
Now 30-01st Qtr and it's already out of control.
23-0 and Prep had an INT in the endzone. LoL
We'll never know, but my guess as well. Souderton caught Pennridge and most likely a full playoff and Souderton gets knocked off by North Penn, Neshaminy, or Coatesville. I think Neshaminy got caught by Pennridge as well as North Penn and Neshaminy. Coatesville had more speed than Pennridge; Pennridge was able to pass on them when the lines were loaded. Pennridge couldn't do this against Souderton. One and done is not a good indicator of the best team in District 1 as there were a few others that looked like they were starting to peak.Not sure Souderton would be playing in this game if it wasn't for the virus. 51-21 mid 3rd
Agree 100%. Souderton no match for North Penn 2016 or Coatesville 2017-2018. I wonder if some teams, looking back, will wish the season hadn't gone ahead.2020 sucks all around.
And the game ends 51-43!I do not disagree with anything mentioned. However, I will point out that no team in District 1 was coming close to SJP. All games would’ve been mercy rules. May other games have been 35-7 at half instead of 44-7? Maybe.
I understand that. Three of the the four previous state semifinals the Prep has played (NP in 2016, Coatesville in 2017, and PCC in 2019) were very close games that could easily have gone the other way.And I realize the final score was 51-43. But SJP was up 51-7 with 12 mins left in the third when they pulled their entire starting line up. Souderton scored on their JV. Keep in mind McCord threw a rare INT in the end zone in the first half.
Tulla, the final score is very deceiving. I am not begrudging SJP for being great. I am just being realistic in my opinion.
With all the flak privates are catching that's a pretty good hustle, making it look like a tight game until a closer look....that most don't do....finds otherwise. How can you explain a coach allowing any game to get this close.True that Souderton played the second half againts the SJP JV. Souderton scored a TD cutting the lead even more, but it was called back due to a penalty. I was wondering if the SJP coach was going to put his starters back in.