Failure Friday

[njfan47]

What better way to start Failure Friday than to update our uniformed board liberals about what is actually going on in the world. Susan Rice, Incapabama's national security advisor, said this week about Obama's North Korea dealings that "you can call it a failure." She then went on to try to include the past two decades, probably to try to cover for the statement by including Bush and Clinton in the responsibility.

No doubt this is partially true, as it wasn't just Incapabama who was responsible. However, it is interesting how little coverage Clinton's role is in all of this receives. His 1994 deal basically set North Korea on the path to achieving the nuclear capability they desired. His decision to give them huge amounts of crude oil was just plain ignorance.

Often the case is made on this board that a president's actions are not felt for 10-20 years, at least when they take on major initiatives; this is a classic case, as Incapabama's "deal" with Iran will probably demonstrate around 2024-2034. That "deal" will likely be way worse than Clinton's North Korea disaster deal, as Iran is likely to be much more offensive with their nukes. Any guesses as to how the left-wing, fake news media will cover that event in terms of investigative work into how bad the deal was and how it set up Iran to become a nuclear power?

 

[Stalker]

What better way to start Failure Friday than to update our uniformed board liberals about what is actually going on in the world. Susan Rice, Incapabama's national security advisor, said this week about Obama's North Korea dealings that "you can call it a failure." She then went on to try to include the past two decades, probably to try to cover for the statement by including Bush and Clinton in the responsibility.

No doubt this is partially true, as it wasn't just Incapabama who was responsible. However, it is interesting how little coverage Clinton's role is in all of this receives. His 1994 deal basically set North Korea on the path to achieving the nuclear capability they desired. His decision to give them huge amounts of crude oil was just plain ignorance.

Often the case is made on this board that a president's actions are not felt for 10-20 years, at least when they take on major initiatives; this is a classic case, as Incapabama's "deal" with Iran will probably demonstrate around 2024-2034. That "deal" will likely be way worse than Clinton's North Korea disaster deal, as Iran is likely to be much more offensive with their nukes. Any guesses as to how the left-wing, fake news media will cover that event in terms of investigative work into how bad the deal was and how it set up Iran to become a nuclear power?

Don’t know about Clinton but I’m sure Obama will continue to spiral down near Bill’s level as the truth comes out about his obvious shortcomings and failed foreign policy with a current and retrospective view. Rarely do you see people fooled as thoroughly as he fooled the masses. He was good! Then again, a look at the major American cities controlled and destroyed by Democrat values and giveaways show how easily that ill-informed base can be hustled by smooth talking Dems, or….their clear understanding you can actually get something for nothing so long as you put a Democrat in there.

But you can only knock Obama so far down as he is a sincere and good father and husband, unlike Clinton who disrespected his family and the office, yet seems indifferent to it all.

Sorry, got a little off point there Nj.