ADVERTISEMENT

Wimp ass draft dodging Donald Trump..at it again

He's certifiable or a democrat in republican garb mucking it up as you alluded. I stepped out of character Paul (above) as a vet seeing a fellow vet attacked, especially one like Sen. McCain who has given so much. The man served in a North Vietnamese prison while shit for brains was in Paris on a student deferment. I just want one swing.
 
I said earlier that I do think Trump is in this to muck it up for the other candidates. So far he's alienated 2 voting blocks (Hispanics and Veterans). Care to place a bet on who the third group might be???
 
I said earlier that I do think Trump is in this to muck it up for the other candidates. So far he's alienated 2 voting blocks (Hispanics and Veterans). Care to place a bet on who the third group might be???
Paul, I am no fan of Trump, but he
He's certifiable or a democrat in republican garb mucking it up as you alluded. I stepped out of character Paul (above) as a vet seeing a fellow vet attacked, especially one like Sen. McCain who has given so much. The man served in a North Vietnamese prison while shit for brains was in Paris on a student deferment. I just want one swing.
Stalker, I am no fan of Trump and this was a huge mistake. However, you must be very concerned that that incompetent, 155 lb. weaking, sad excuse of a president, has not spoken publically about the muslim shooting and murder of four marines last week in Chattanooga. The flag is not at half mast and the parents have not even been contacted. Yet, he was heavily involved in the Michael Brown, MIT professor, and Travon Martin incidents. What a shame. He is a small man indeed.
 
njfan47....I am concerned about all the issues you raised and agree with your message but it has nothing to do with this thread or Trump's disparaging remarks about a decorated war veteran.
 
njfan47....I am concerned about all the issues you raised and agree with your message but it has nothing to do with this thread or Trump's disparaging remarks about a decorated war veteran.
The point of my post was to get people to focus on what is really important and not be influenced by the fact that the media focused on Trump's comments rather than the lack of respect to the military by the 155 lb. weakling president. Trump's comments were awful. He is a guy who is running for office. The guy (if you want to stretch and call him that) who is in office either is too stupid to know that the flag should be lowered to half mast, or just doesn't care. Whatever the reason for the lack of action, you can decide, but I think one story is bigger than another. But leave it for people to be influenced by the media without even being aware of it.

As just one more example, Stalker, what about the 155 lb. weakling commuting sentences of drug dealers? Many of them will be out on the streets by November of this year? Shouldn't you also want to get this bitch locked in a room so you can do some damage? Basically, if you haven't figured it out by now, I just want to know what the difference is. I don't know your politics, but maybe that's part of the reason for this? It has to be either that or media influence, no?

As another example, what about the 100+ cities in the USA that do not enforce federal immigration law? What about the young woman who was shot by an illegal immigrant who had been deported five different times?

I think both obama and trump are small men who lack character and don't really have a lot of people that they are close to. Neither is likeable. But the damage done by trump can't compare to the damage done by Obama and the liberals. One more thing: are you aware of the "redefining" of neighborhood ethnic makeup? Over 1,200 neighborhoods are targeted in all parts of the country.
 
Last edited:
So you're saying my mentioning Trump is not important....that I'm not focusing on important things, ie....things you decide are important?
I'm not writing a book on the man, it was a simple thread to express an opinion. Wow nj!
 
So you're saying my mentioning Trump is not important....that I'm not focusing on important things, ie....things you decide are important?
I'm not writing a book on the man, it was a simple thread to express an opinion. Wow nj!
Is that really your take on my post? I can say it too: wow Stalker. I think I made it pretty clear that it was about prioritization of events, but I guess it didn't get through. Is Trump's dissing of McCain really more important and more impactful to the citizens of this country than the things that I mentioned obama and the liberals are doing? Not telling you what to post on, just questioning why you would post on this issue when so many more important things are happening. The answer to the question is most likely media influence.
 
Not my take on things nj, simply quoting you...."The point of my post was to get people to focus on what is really important". Nothing more.
 
Jeez, this is getting difficult. Could it have been that you were posting on Trump because you were unaware of the other issues? Did you judge the Trump issue as important because that is what the media was focusing on?

I think the following issues are way more important than Trump/McCain and I didn't see you post on any of them:
  • over 104,000 illegal immigrants released into the public in 2013 instead of being deported
  • Planed Parenthood selling body parts of fetuses
  • the Justice Dept. doing nothing about Planned Parenthood selling body parts of fetuses
  • the existence of sanctuary cities
  • the murder of a promising young lady in San Francisco by an illegal immigrant who had been deported five times, and not a single mention of this by obama, the same obama who was very quick to respond to the Michael Brown incident (caused by Michael Brown, I might add, according to Attorney General Eric Holder) and many other similar incidents
  • not lowering the flag to half mast when four marine recruiters are killed by a muslim terrorist in Chattanooga
  • the planned release of over 40 drug dealers, many of whom, curiously, were cocaine/crack dealers
  • the redefining of neighborhood ethnic makeup, based on threatening to pull Federal funding on over 1,200 cities if they don't comply
  • a questionable, at best, arms treaty with Iran that Saudi Arabia AND Israel both don't like and which will give Iran's economy a boost, allowing it to fund terror groups like Hamas and Hezbollah at a much higher rate than they have in the past.
I just find it amazing that you let the media dictate that you would post on Trump/McCain instead of any of these other topics. And the list could be a lot larger than what appears above. Don't get me wrong, you can post on anything you want, nobody can stop you; those are givens. It's not a personal attack on you; it just demonstrates the power of the media and also all that obama is doing and not doing to the detriment of this country.
 
Guess I wasn't clear the first time above so I'll try again.

I am concerned about all the issues you raised and agree with your message but it has nothing to do with this thread or Trump's disparaging remarks about a decorated war veteran.
 
Stalker, maybe we should just consider this issue closed because the point I am trying to make is just not getting through! I really hesitate to ask, but I'd be curious to know how many of those issues you were actually aware of.
 
Ok Caitlen Jenner go. I am sure Obama will be mentioned. How about the shark attacks uh oh Obama will be mentioned. The shooting in Louisianna Obama this or that. He is on his way out NJ so we will have a new president soon. You can make it chief
 
Ok Caitlen Jenner go. I am sure Obama will be mentioned. How about the shark attacks uh oh Obama will be mentioned. The shooting in Louisianna Obama this or that. He is on his way out NJ so we will have a new president soon. You can make it chief
Sammy, your post and those of the other guy demonstrate why we are in the shape we are in today. People just don't want to focus on the issues and want to focus on the trivial or less important issues. And I have done just fine under obama, in spite of obama. My complaints are related to how his policies are affecting and are going to affect people down the road, similar to the Clinton Housing Bubble; things were fine when he left office, but the housing policy was extremely flawed. If you want to ignore these issues, that is fine. The "head in the sand" approach has never really had a good record, though!
 
The post was about Trump and it was spun start an Obama thread and post issues there
 
The post was about Trump and it was spun start an Obama thread and post issues there
So, we need to establish the Sammy/Stalker rule that would state that once a post is started, the topic must not be changed, under any circumstances. All subsequent posts under that thread must focus on that topic, no matter how trivial the original post might be, and no matter what else is going on.
 
So when we talk about Obama issues we can then bring up GW Bush issues, Reagan issues ect. Ok
 
So when we talk about Obama issues we can then bring up GW Bush issues, Reagan issues ect. Ok
Sure, thread topics change and evolve over time. But we need to give consideration to enacting the Sammy/Stalker rule. It's all about control. A guy who starts a thread apparently can dictate the all subsequent posters stick strictly to the topic! Crazy stuff.
 
This was straight on, Sammy. No deflection. The Sammy/Stalker rule is in effect by the control freaks! Look at the number of posts on the football board start out on one subject and turn into something different. It's ok, but when it's on the political board and exposes issues like media bias and voter ignorance, it definitely isn't ok!

Notice that the guy never answered the question about how many of the issues he had actually been aware of. That tells me all I need to know. It's kind of like the People Magazine approach to politics where people are easily distracted by the trivial while having no awareness of what is happening. It's how guys like obama get elected and re-elected. It's how terrible nuclear deals with Iran get done, only to have someone post about wanting to fight Trump.
 
Last edited:
njfan47... you're ability to cut & paste is amazing. However when left to come up with a single coherent thought of your own you are left lacking. Your point was to steer this conversation in the direction of something you thought important. Why not make your own thread?
 
So getting back onto THIS topic .... how could any vet, friend of a vet or family of a vet or just an admirer of a vet support Trump? He basically said anyone who didn't come home from a war was not a hero. Is the right that desperate for a shot at the White House that they'll overlook this opinion? Say what you will about McCain's politics ..... the guy is a friggin hero.
 
I know that I have been instructed to stay on topic by not one, but now two, liberals, so I am going out on a limb here (!) but how could anyone support obama based on the horrible job he has done with the VA? It's always the same with you liberals/socialists/communists, words are more important than actions. Trump made a huge, stupid mistake with that statement, but it was a one-time situation; obama did nothing for several years to clean up the situation. Inaction and incompetence. What else could you expect from President Incapable!
 
How did Bush do by the VA? Trump made a huge, stupid mistake ... that he oh by the way reiterated and would not back away from. Obama will go down in history as one of our strongest Presidents. The other end of the spectrum from your boy Bush. I'll bet you are one of those guys that won't even give Obama credit for doing away with Bin Laden. You're a hypocrite.
 
Bush did not do well with the VA either. I am able to say that, while you are in denial about President Incapable. The guy is so weak that he has allowed Putin and Xi Jinping (that's the President of China, gingy) to arguably become the two strongest men in the world. You are asleep.
 
Ut oh? As if that is going to take Trump down? He's Teflon, gingy. Just like obama was. Get used to it.
 
It's still funny you think you're important enough for some internet troll to create a new screen name 18 months ago and wait to use it until now. Anyway, you didn't address the post again. You just deflected. Even with Trump's big lead he doesn't project to beat any democrat nominee. I don't see the R's winning another Presidency. Get used to it.
 
Gingy, I don't think you changed names for me, I think you changed screen names (or added a new name) because liberals like you and blowing comb are complete phonies and pussies; afraid of people even though this is a message board to which their real names are completely anonymous. As for Trump, I don't need to defend him; I like to see democrats so worried about him doing so well; if he weren't any kind of threat at all, he wouldn't be talked about. It's as if the dems don't know that they've had a radical in office for the past six and a half years, and the other side might have a chance to have their own radical candidate get into office. Turnabout, afterall, is fair play, although libs might want to rewrite that rule too. Immature punks that they are!
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT