I'm thinking if the results in this year's playoffs had occurred a year earlier we wouldn't have this ridiculous plan to have six classes next year and beyond.
From all I heard and read last year the push to increase the number of classifications was clearly related to the Prep and Wood again winning state championships. The PIAA decided rather than to create separate classes for "non-publics" (which I think would have been a bad move) to go from four to six classes with the idea that this would be fairer to all--and probably result in more public schools winning state championships.
But UD's victory of North Penn (a much larger school, isn't it?) is another indication that the size of the school (in broad terms) makes less of a difference than people think. Of course there should be different classifications based on school size but the difference between very large and quite large or between small and a bit smaller doesn't merit the kind of fine dicing that having six classes will require especially since in the present situation schools (like WC and TEP) can "play up."
And Parkland's win over LaSalle just confirms what we knew last year--that the advantage "non-public" schools have in being able to recruit isn't one that makes it so very hard for a public school to beat them, that the advantage may not be as great as some think it is and that just maybe some public schools have advantages of their own.
Anyway, I can't imagine that six classifications will result in more interesting games next year.
From all I heard and read last year the push to increase the number of classifications was clearly related to the Prep and Wood again winning state championships. The PIAA decided rather than to create separate classes for "non-publics" (which I think would have been a bad move) to go from four to six classes with the idea that this would be fairer to all--and probably result in more public schools winning state championships.
But UD's victory of North Penn (a much larger school, isn't it?) is another indication that the size of the school (in broad terms) makes less of a difference than people think. Of course there should be different classifications based on school size but the difference between very large and quite large or between small and a bit smaller doesn't merit the kind of fine dicing that having six classes will require especially since in the present situation schools (like WC and TEP) can "play up."
And Parkland's win over LaSalle just confirms what we knew last year--that the advantage "non-public" schools have in being able to recruit isn't one that makes it so very hard for a public school to beat them, that the advantage may not be as great as some think it is and that just maybe some public schools have advantages of their own.
Anyway, I can't imagine that six classifications will result in more interesting games next year.