I was at the LC-NG game.. in all honesty it was over in the first Q... I have a question for the board.. this is not to re-hash the debate about open enrollment or recruiting but a legitimate question.. first I want to take out the kids that are true "blue chip" players that choose a school for sports reasons from this conversation..
.. and leave in the average players that make up most teams... do you think that letting players in the city play at any city school vs the one they live near going to kill football (or any sport) for the PPL and PCL. Where I am going with this is.. If a school like NG has 2 or 3 true difference makers (not blue chip players but above average and choose to play a crosstown at another.. will other kids decide that they will travel else were vs playing for their neighborhood school or not even play at all?.. I'm not sure if I'm explaining the question correctly.. what I am trying to say is.. will letting kids in the city play at any city school begin to kill football at averages programs in Philly?
.. and leave in the average players that make up most teams... do you think that letting players in the city play at any city school vs the one they live near going to kill football (or any sport) for the PPL and PCL. Where I am going with this is.. If a school like NG has 2 or 3 true difference makers (not blue chip players but above average and choose to play a crosstown at another.. will other kids decide that they will travel else were vs playing for their neighborhood school or not even play at all?.. I'm not sure if I'm explaining the question correctly.. what I am trying to say is.. will letting kids in the city play at any city school begin to kill football at averages programs in Philly?