Kim Jong-un

[Stalker]

I wonder why we don't take this stubby little fat wuss out? His own may do it soon enough if he keeps embarrassing the regime. Oh, for the good ole days!

 

[njfan47]

I wonder why we don't take this stubby little fat wuss out? His own may do it soon enough if he keeps embarrassing the regime. Oh, for the good ole days!

Because there is a pussy in the White House.

 

[sammyk]

Hmmm North Korea has been around since the 50's right looks like a lot of pussies I the White House

 

[paul from philly]

No Sammy, there was one who wasn't a pussy and the was Harry S. Truman. According to some former army guys, my father included, the greatest President ever, for obvious reasons!!!

 

[njfan47]

Hmmm North Korea has been around since the 50's right looks like a lot of pussies I the White House

Leave it to another Democrat to miss the point entirely (Sammy). They have only had serious nuclear weapons in the last 25 years or so. And it was Clinton's nuclear "agreement" with North Korea that was supposed to limit their capability. Similar to Incapabama's "deal" with Iran.

North Korea laughed in Clinton's face, as Iran will do to Incapabama. In each case, it's another president's problem. Notice that the media never brings up Clinton's role in North Korea's development and you can count on them to hardly mention Incapabama's role in the Iran deal. This means that people need to think for themselves. Good luck with that, Liberals/Democrats/Socialists!

 

[reluctant_to_comment]

Christ you get so predictable ChristieFan ... 50 years all comes down to Clinton and Obama. You probably just forgot to mention Carter. You don't have an ounce of integrity.

 

[njfan47]

Christ you get so predictable ChristieFan ... 50 years all comes down to Clinton and Obama. You probably just forgot to mention Carter. You don't have an ounce of integrity.

Reluctant to Think, how about if you reply with some facts to counter my argument? As you may have noticed, there are absolutely zero facts in your reply. Typical.

 

[paul from philly]

Reluctant to Think, how about if you reply with some facts to counter my argument? As you may have noticed, there are absolutely zero facts in your reply. Typical.

He's right Reluctant. Never anything of substance. I'll wait for the insult!!

 

[njfan47]

He's right Reluctant. Never anything of substance. I'll wait for the insult!!

Thanks for the props Paul. Isn't it amazing, this mental midget is so clueless that in the same post where he mentions me not having an ounce on integrity, he offers nothing to support his claim. This foolishness is humorous! Next, it's going to be either no reply or something way off-center (forfeit or insanity)!