A few thoughts after finally settling in…
As I said before, Easton clearly had the size, speed and talent advantage. Phillipsburgs lack of size was somewhat surprising. I thought we may see a mercy-rule by the 3rd quarter or so. I was perplexed by Easton’s lack of offensive identity. You’ll see Pro-I, shotgun spread, under center split backs, etc. Rarely will you see the same formation more than two or three times. It feels like they are clinging to the past with Pro-I power run game, but they aren’t good at it (their OL has no technique). Then the next play, they’ll be in a four-wide set. It’s befuddling. I think they should choose what they want to be (both can work!) and stick with it.
The QB seems to have a lot of talent. He looks like an old-school pro style QB. Big kid with decent athleticism (enough to keep you honest). I don’t think they do the QB many favors. Their passing game design is very limited (most plays consist of him rolling out and trying to throw an out route to the sideline). He’s a big kid, with a strong arm, why not keep him in the pocket more often to use the full field? Why not give him so easy completions with short, quick throws to get the ball to your playmakers in space. He also has tons of weapons! I know RB #6 is the headliner, but I was quite impressed with #2, #1, #10 and #5 (who unfortunately left the game with an injury). The OL has some big boys that could move for their size. Considering the weapons of Easton, and talent disparity between the two teams, coming out of that game with 7 points is almost unfathomable.
Phillipsburg had a few nice players. I liked QB. #6 and #10 were solid skill players (There may have been 1 or 2 kids on Pburg that would start for Easton). Their offense really lacked creativity. I give Easton’s defense credit though. They were in position for every mis-direction type of play. They intercepted a throwback and double pass. They always had guys staying home vs counters and reverses. Pburg had a modicum of success with their traditional plays (buck sweep and QB power), but Easton did a nice job of bending and not breaking. I was really impressed with Easton’s LB #29. He seemed to be all over the field.
I don’t like criticizing coaching, contrary to what many probably think considering I do it too often LOL. But there were some real head scratchers in this one. Easton’s staff had no plan as to what they wanted to do in fourth and short situations. Sometimes they’d punt, sometimes they’d go for it, sometimes they’d try a long FG (occasionally at a distance that seemed way out of the kickers range). It just didn’t appear to be thought out whatsoever. It felt as though they were flying by the seat of their pants. As Rover stated, Pburg handed the game to them. All they had to do was punt the ball (their punter was by far their best player) and stop some Hail Mary attempts.
As you can probably tell, I’m a “public school guy.” I enjoy watching the teams that have a strong tradition (Easton, CB West, etc). I guess it’s the nostalgia at my old age LOL. I still believe Easton has all the prerequisites in place to be one of the strongest programs in the state. There is no reason they can’t win D11 consistently (and beat Pburg like a drum). They’ll need a new (or improved) staff to accomplish this. The current one is simply overmatched.
All in all, it was a great experience. I’d highly recommend attending if you haven’t done so. I heard 13-14k tickets were sold. Lafayette was packed and the environment was electric. Most importantly, I’m sure those kids will never forget that game. What a great tradition. Kudos to both communities. You don’t see TDay games often anymore, but I’m really glad this one has survived! I’m also glad I made the trip, I can’t recommend it enough for any fan of high school football.