I thought SV had the speed advantage? That was the Sauss we were told.
We saw this coming at the beginning of the year. The addition of 2 very good coaches to their staff ,coupled with several d-1 players ,and at least 5 players that I recognize as being former athletes on 4 different PCL teams that now belong to the Tep. Albie has done a remarkable job assembling a powerhouse program.This score doesn't surprise me at all. Tep is very impressive and I don't think anyone will beat them. Great info Relayer, it puts it all in perspective. Open enrollment has it's advantages.
I can remember when Haven played Wyoming Area at Coatesville in 2003. The WA guys on the board (much respect) thought it was their year. Haven won that game 49-0. They came on the board and said, Wow we're we wrong. We're not in the same league. This game kind of reminds me of that in Philly area team dominating an up state team.
As far as speed, you can neutralize it in two ways. If you have outside LB's with quick speed that can cover the outsides coupled with a defensive line control, your not going anywhere.
It's safe to say D12 has made a mockery of 3A in the east. These are not preliminary games, these are the state quarter and semi finals. The east used to have very good teams (Berwick, Strath Haven, ACC and Manheim Central to name a few). What happened?
Scores from the past 5 years leading into Hershey:
2011
Wood 41 Pottsgrove 22
Wood 70 ACC 14
2012
Wood 35 Interboro 7
Wood 36 ACC 6
2013
Wood 42 Academy Park 14
Wood 42 Berwick 14
2014
Wood 44 Great Valley 7
Wood 63 Somerset 20
2015
Imhotep 46 Academy Park 16
Imhotep 72 Saucon Valley 27
IMO, the PIAA should move to Cath schools up to 6A. If they're this good then they should be challenged and not a walk in the park. We know Wood can beat LaSalle, that's my point.
What the hell. What can I say.Wow foot.
I'm waiting for the day when a team decides to forfeit a playoff game against a cath school. I know the PIAA has taken some heat on how they've handed the cath schools joining.
Point well taken. I guess I should have clarified my position better. I wouldn't expect a team like Holy Cross move up to 6A considering they would only be an A team next year. I would move them up to 3A.
Most of the guys on this board are 4A. Most 4A competitive public schools can like North Penn, Pennsbury, etc. can hang with LaSalle. The problem I see which many don't look at is the 3A and 2A cath. team who are too competitive for the 3A and 2A public schools. They just don't have the numbers on their side. If you look at all the good Haven teams through the years, their lines were never as big as what Wood has. Haven's 2010 team (lost to Wood 24-14) had a nice line but couldn't control Wood on either side of the ball.
I'm waiting for the day when a team decides to forfeit a playoff game against a cath school. I know the PIAA has taken some heat on how they've handed the cath schools joining.
Personally, I have nothing against any private school (great education). I think there should be some adjustments to offset the powers. I can see how HR and HC could be at a disadvantage. I'm assuming demographics play a part? not enough kids in the area to draw from?
Not to change the subject, but......Different sport, but I know. Big Ten wrestling coach who removes kids from his recruiting board who transfer during high school. Now, he's at a school where he's only recruits blue chippers, so he has the luxury of being very selective. But after he had some team and character problems early in his career, he decided that was a red flag he could weed out.
He explained the logic to me that if a kid can pick up and leave his friends and teammates who he's been with his whole life to find greener grass, what makes him think they'll buy in to his college program and team.
Obviously that's not everywhere, or even most places. I've always thought it was an interesting perspective.
Here is an article about the situation.EPC, I'll bump the other thread to keep this thread on topic after this post. I haven't seen local news today, did something happen beyond the school board meeting the other night where they announced the committee?
As I said before, I don't even have a problem with administrator privately addressing with Steve perceived problems with the program, and I do think you need a succession plan for a 64 year old head coach who has already retired from teaching (ditto for the wrestling program). But to publicly announce a committee to address Steve's performance and allot an agenda item at a school board meeting to a public airing of grievances, with the essential complaint being his offense and play calling is preventing a state championship, is a total failure of leadership in the athletic department and does nothing but publicly embarrass the winningest coach in school history who has been on the staff since 1975, and the head coach for 23 years in a job that gets probably five times the scrutiny as mayor of Easton.
And if what this group truly wants is a home run hire to replace Shiffert, can you even imagine being Tim Moncman looking at the Easton job, seeing how this all is being handled, and think "gee, I'd love to work there?"